I too was unimpressed. There was a pretty cool scene involving these secondary organisms, where one swallows Kristen Stewart whole... still a better love story than Twilight.Here's my problem outside of the lazy design of the primary organism, if they knew they were going to phone it in on the CGI, maybe they shouldn't have showcased these things quite so clearly. I know it’s a pretty full on question and I apologise if it brings back any unsavoury visions/memories.This gave me chills. I'm low key kinda glad this movie wasn't as good as it looked in the previews, because now I don't have to apologize.To be fair, she did okay as her performance was good enough for horror. Consider supporting him by purchasing a copy.I like the completely unnecessary plug for your book in the first part there...Underwater: An excuse to plug my book, having nothing to do with the movie.How can you presume to know what C'thulu looks like?You know what? Paddling along, having the time of my life, when a massive dark shape emerged in the distance - before I knew it, it was sailing RIGHT UNDER ME. Something was flashing from our lights. To be clear I love her work when she is used correctly however this was something she did not prepare enough for or maybe just cant do though I think its the former.Yeah, as I noted, its better, not good. Cinemark Underwater isn't going to do that for Stewart, but it will help her ascend from the depths of sparkling vampires.I want to point out, I was also seriously worried that this movie was going to be a better version of the book I just got done writing. You … Pretty much anything by Susan Snyder (who, by the way, has a Shark themed horror review). Except, I feel like Sphere was a better Lovecraftian concept.I feel like people are giving her to much credit because of the sheer difference between this and twilight. Don't see it on Amazon.I agree with the others who responded, you do put in a plug for your book but I'm assuming it's more to do with the fact that you don't want people to think you've ripped off Underworld's concept, which is fair enough.I hadn't heard of you Reed but am always looking out for new (to me) horror writers so looking forward to reading your stuff. They had a good environment to hid them in which could have prevented this embarrassment.The final scene is what drives home the lukewarm performance. I'm low key kinda glad this movie wasn't as good as it looked in the previews, because now I don't have to apologize.To be fair, she did okay as her performance was good enough for horror. I think, whoever did the design for the primary organism was trying to reinvent the wheel on C'thulian design, and failed. So let me say it loud and clear, while this movie was likely written before I wrote I'm actually gonna take a moment to explain why my book is better than this movie. If Alien was like a haunted house in space, then Underwater is a haunted house...underwater. Yesterday at 7:37 PM #2 Not keen on her, don't get the fan club element at all, the Movie, nothing new … Look out for The science in this movie is also really bad. Underwater levels in platformers, token diving sections in open-world games—they're usually not great. I've compared a lot of the worst acting in horror to Ms. Stewart and I never exactly let up on her for her involvement in Twilight. Just one thing, please don't make all women beautiful and smart and all men assholes and dumb in your books. 2 3 K. keithwiggins Active Member. Rad B-movie schlock, this feels like an artifact from the late-1980s and delivers exactly what I hoped it would. I just froze in the water and it felt like my heart stopped. Frankly, it was kinda chuncy.