They refer to ordinary business and work or study meetings of councils, boards and committees. Surprisingly, however, these knowledgeable high level speakers, including office holders, often are limited to the same time constriction and queing requirements as all other public commentors. There may be informal expectation that such a party may comment, but if it is an interested agency then there will be prior notification and a larger chunk of time may be allowed to such presenters. However, a constructive, information-rich comment that clearly communicates and supports its claims is more likely to have an impact on regulatory decision making. They are trained to analyze and synthesize data and to navigate the technical context in which their own work takes place. Scientists can think of public comment as a type of peer review for federal regulations. And as with scientific peer review, the most effective and helpful reviewers are those that demonstrate expert understanding of the issue and support positions with substantive data.The words "statute" and "law" are basically interchangeable, as are "regulations" and "rules." Or scroll down the page to see all topic areas. It is not typical to require that the person commenting be a resident, a registered voter, a qualified elector, or even a citizen, simply that they be present and able to speak.Public comment in some cases includes remarks from experts or public officials with some role in the issue at stake, but at a different time or level of process. They may include video clips. The above distinction between agenda-item public comment and what is called "general public comment" pertains both to legislative type bodies as well as executive agencies. They … It casts a wider net for collecting scientific information by encouraging participation by scientists across disciplines, sectors, and career states. Members of the public—both individuals and organizations—were invited to provide comments on the Healthy People draft framework and proposed objectives for consideration by HHS. In such systems, even the very idea of exposure to risk of prosecution deters the flow of information needed for the system's self rationalization process, resulting in stifled innovation, accumulated inefficiencies, decline of group morale and trust levels, with eventual system collapse.As indicated above, there is a separate and distinct form of public comment, in the US, does not occur at meetings but is solicited in written or electronic form prior to a set deadline. Public comment is an essential part of developing Healthy People 2030. Public Comment May 1, 5-7pm Fremont Branch, Seattle Public Library Workshop: 4th National Climate Assessment January 9, 17, 25, 29 UW Seattle, ATG/OSB. One is when comment goes to a specific agenda item. Other instances occur with regard to publication of draft environmental impact reports, which comments are then answered and may be reflected in subsequent revisions to the document.