Find out which is better and their overall performance in the CPU ranking.
What makes the Ryzen 5 3600X worth considering is the value on offer for the price.While it does have half the cores and threads of the Ryzen 9 3900X, it's still capable of handling even the more demanding games of today (though both CPUs do lag behind the competition in some tests), and you'll be more than satisfied with productivity results. On the left side, where Ryzen would normally be completely underwater, it’s losing by about 4 to 7 percent, which isn’t much when you consider Intel still has a 400MHz advantage.More cores typically translates into more performance. When you don't need a mass of cores and threads, this CPU will be more than happy to play your favorite games and render all your media.Looking around for a motherboard to install your new AMD Ryzen 5 3600X processor?
vs. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3950X. In fact, the Ryzen 7 part gets many spikes into the 100+ FPS zone which the 3900Xmisses out on. Special edition: AMD talks 3rd-Gen Threadripper and Ryzen 9 3950X ... Today, the 12-core Ryzen 9 3900X is $21 per thread. vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X. Today, it’s mostly 3D animation artists who can use it the most, along with those who do video editing or video encoding. From video editing and intense gaming to enthusiast leaderboard competitions, this processor can almost do it all. For example, while the Core i9 outperforms the Ryzen 9, it does that using a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and at 1080p resolution. What is the difference between AMD Ryzen 9 3950X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X?
Adobe’s Photoshop, for example, really doesn’t use a lot of cores until you hit certain filters or tasks.Two factors we didn’t get into that should mentioned is that’s mostly with a conventional gaming experience, without adding streaming into the mix, or what visual quality settings you like to play at.PCWorld helps you navigate the PC ecosystem to find the products you want and the advice you need to get the job done.The speed difference is stupidly different, as you can see below where we used the x86 CPU cores to encode a video using HEVC vs. using the Quick Sync support in the Core i9.To outsiders, AMD’s triumphant launch of Ryzen 3000 looks like total victory with the only thing left to do is schedule the ticker-tape parade down Broadway.And yes nerds, we hear you: If you only play games and don’t need the high-thread count of either chip, a Core i7-9700K (or lower) or Ryzen 7 3700X (or lower) gets you far more bang for your buck.This story, however, is about folks who need the multi-threaded performance of the Core i9 or Ryzen 9.
The Ryzen 9 3900X is really designed for those who need a CPU with 12 cores and 24 threads. The editorial team does not participate in the writing or editing of SponsoredPosts.Intel’s Quick Sync feature (only on CPUs with integrated graphics) puts conventional CPU-based encoding to shame.One ace up Intel’s sleeve has been its Quick Sync support, which is built into Intel CPUs with Intel integrated graphics. Installing this six-core monster into your desktop will allow for some serious levels of productivity.The best graphics card is what you will need to have if you plan on enjoying PC games.
Just to give you an idea: Intel charged $1,723 for the 10-core Core i7-6950X in 2016. So hands down, we’d recommend Ryzen over Core for multi-threaded applications.Picked by Techconnect's EditorsFortunately, the truth is a lot more nuanced.
第3世代Ryzenプロセッサーの最上位モデル「Ryzen 9 3950X」と「Ryzen 9 3900X」のベンチマークスコアを掲載。インテルCPUとのスコア比較やゲームベンチマークスコアも比較。 Quick Sync is Intel’s fixed function encode support that accelerates video encoding tasks.BrandPosts are written and edited by members of our sponsor community.