If you get the 8700 non-k, buy a cheaper aftermarket cooler like a Hyper 212 Evo for 20-30 and you are set.Actually, my advice is: Unless you want to overclock to at least 4.7+ Ghz, go with the non-k version.You can save a lot of money this way. The price per performance of the i5 8600k is considerably higher than the i7 8700k because it’s around $100 dollars cheaper.
The 8700 tends to run not as hot as well. Buy used: $299.99. In s best case scanario hyperthreading gives about 30% more multithreaded performance per core assuming the software can effectively utilize arbitrary numbers of cores/threads. Higher core counts are for productivity, not gaming.
Because the non K is unable to sync all cores (no multicore enhancement). If you are purely looking to upgrade your CPU for gaming then you can’t go wrong with the cheaper i5 8600k.
The 8700k can win in well-threaded applications like Blender, but for gaming and most other use cases the 9700k is better.Currently, Games don't use anything beyond 6 cores, so extra of either is a waste unless you predict games moving into the 8 core range, but I don't see that happening anytime soon as we are only just seeing 6 core usage in 2019. The k is also higher binned, which means for same clocks will need slightly less voltage, but also barely matters.If you don't plan to OC, just get the nonk if the price difference is worth it (the k will have better resale value).You won't notice the difference in most apps. Windows 10 version 1803 was used for all testing with Windows Update disabled. Although if your not gaming then specify.Other good option would be to save some dolla and drop down to 9600k OR go Ryzen.i9700k.
Intel I7 8700 vs 8700K vs 9700K | Tested 13 Games | - YouTube Does anyone think it's overkill and not worth the extra $50?for games it will provide a very very small performance boost going with the 9700k. Was originally going to get the 8700k but i saw the 9700k and don't really mind spending the extra $50 to get it. 8700 is a 65W chip while the 8700k is a 95W chip. For the most part there isn't a big performance difference unless you start OCing the 8700kThe 65W vs 95W ratings are not really what you will experience in the real world.With the correct settings in the bios and cooling, the 8700 will easily go over the 65W.the Base clock does not really matter since if you have adequate cooling your CPU will function at the turbo speed.In fact, a lower base clock can be beneficial if power usage is a concern.It is true that the k version does not come with a heatsink but the 8700 does.
The 9700k has 33% more cores, so that already puts its multithreaded performance marginally higher,but effectively equal to the 8700k of you give the 8700k the best case, however if the workload will effectively use between 6 and 12 cores/threads, not all of the logical threads on the 8700k will be utilized and the 9700k would get a slight lead.I went with the 9700k and have no regrets.Wait for possible price drops near AMD ryzen 3 releaseArticle is paid, but they are saying intel is goin g to drop CPU prices of 8 and 9 series by 10-15% Is this a real question lol.
Even better, wait for July 7th and get a Ryzen 3700x ( 329$ ) or 3800x ( 399$ ), 8 cores, 16 threads, same as 9900k.
PresentMon is used for framerate data logging, with custom scripts for capturing data accurately.
If you’re comfortable enough to build a computer with an I7 8700k, please do yourself a favor and spend the extra $50 for the 9790k. 4.3GHz is the max 6-core turbo for both SKUs.8700 isn't a "65w chip", it guzzles 105-110 watts sustained when running 100% AVX if you let it so it doesn't power throttle.Max turbo on the non-k is 4.6GHz, vs 4.7 GHz on the k, while the all core boost is the same on both (4.3Ghz).So basically, 100 MHz difference at 1 core, no difference all core. The k is for overclocking. What will you be doing with the cpu? The k is unlocked, and 100mhz in few core turbo (which barely matters).
If you are planning on paying extra, get a 9900k, or save money with a 9600k, with the 8700k somewhere in the middle.As soon as games go higher than 8 threads in the near future, 8700k will be better.Even better, wait for July 7th and get a Ryzen 3700x ( 329$ ) or 3800x ( 399$ ), 8 cores, 16 threads, same as 9900k.Not really, the benefit of additional threads from hyperthreading is dramatically lower than real cores. i5 8600k vs i7 8700k For Gaming. People will tell you $100 for 5% increase?! If you don't want to overclock the 8700 or 8400 are better choices though, unless you are buying a prebuilt because then the 8700 will not reach its boost clock since that would take power out of spec, according to Computerbase.The 8700k is at the most 100mhz faster than the non k. At 6 core usage, they are equal.