To compare AMD vs Intel CPUs based on specs and features, we could chart the entire product stacks, but for the sake of brevity we'll focus on the top chips in the respective product lines. You don't need to drop major dollars to see the advantages of AMD's chips, though. However, it’s specifically geared toward gaming laptops. The processors are going to be able to improve tasks like 4k encoding.It’s a powerhouse processor that’s going to push the limits of what computers can do. Think of this as numerous pieces of a puzzle that come together to form one larger picture. As such, AMD still holds the price-per-thread advantage in many prices ranges, though Intel generally offers more performance in several types of workloads (which we'll cover below).This article covers the never-ending argument of AMD vs Intel desktop CPUs (we're not covering laptop or server chips) based on what you plan to do with your PC, pricing, performance, driver support, power consumption and security, giving us a clear view of the state of the competition. That's partly due to AMD's new designs forcing the company to boost its core counts, which in turn reduces the number of chips Intel can produce, combined with 10nm delays that created issues with forecasting and logistics.The AMD vs. Intel CPU conversation is changing as Intel lowers pricing on its mainstream lineup, but it still hasn't eased its draconian segmentation policies that limit features, like overclockability, to pricey chips and motherboards. We expect most builds in the mid-range to come with lesser GPUs, which generally serves as an equalizer in terms of CPU performance. Power consumption comes as a byproduct of design choices, like lithography and architecture which we'll discuss below. Those factors combine to make Intel a notorious power guzzler.In contrast, AMD only offers integrated graphics on its APU models, which means you'll need a discrete graphics card (GPU) for any chip that has more than four cores (or costs more than ~$150). Search.
As such, we'll focus on the non-XT Ryzen models for these comparisons.In terms of per-core performance, the move to the Zen 2 architecture brought AMD's processors to near-parity with Intel's finest. The company's Comet Lake processors have helped short up Intel's defenses in the ciritical mid-range, but, as we've seen, AMD isn't sitting still.Intel plans to fix this in the future with microarchitectures that are portable between nodes. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990x That's particularly painful for Intel because the company suffers from far more of these vulnerabilities than other vendors.Thank you for signing up to Tom's Hardware. The entire Ryzen 3000 series are all fairly evenly-matched when it comes to frame rates and multitasking abilities, so it all comes down to how many cores and threads you'll need.However, the new Comet Lake-S desktop processors have just been unveiled and are well on their way, led by the Core i9-10900K.