So for those seeking strong gaming performance and good value, the 10600K is an appealing option. The CPU cores clock at 3.6 GHz base and using Precision Boost 2 up to 4.2 GHz. As we said in the beginning – the Price / Performance ratio is on the AMD side again.The other difference is the integrated graphics – the well-known Intel UHD Graphics and for AMD we have Radeon Vega 8 Graphics.Our table with detailed specs is down below.In Cinebench the Core i5-10210U is a bit faster – 6.5%. Of course, there are other benefits of the higher end Core i7 and Core i9 CPUs such as a large L3 cache, but in most games they probably won’t be that much faster. Moreover, when compared to the 3700X, the 10600K might have provided a higher average frame rate but it was slightly slower when comparing 1% low performance.Next up we have code compilation performance. Not a big difference but we have to note it.Good question. Intel Core i5-8250U vs. AMD Ryzen 5 3500U - Cinebench 11.5, Cinebench R15, PassMark and Geekbench 3 CPU Benchmark results A bit lower Cinebench score but when it comes to the raw integrated graphics power Radeon Vega 8 is a T-Rex.Good job AMD – you got the power!It’s time for the direct comparisons.Ok, its time for the specs. Without any power limits in place the Core i5-10600K pushed total system usage to 198 watts, slightly higher than the 9700K and a 12% increase over the 8700K.
Testing with Far Cry New Dawn at 1080p sees a frame rate boost of 12% and this was enough to put the 10600K on par with the 10700K and 10900K.Moving on to 7-zip, the 10600K again matched the 8700K in decompression performance, making it 20% slower than the 3600 and almost 40% slower than the 3700X.Next up we have the Blender Open Data benchmark where the 10600K was 5% faster than the 8700K, completing the CPU benchmark is 1282 seconds. AMD Ryzen 5 3500U remove. ASUS ZENBOOK 14 - 8GB RAM, RYZEN 5 3500U, 2GB RADEON 8 VEGA INTEGRATED, 512 GB SSDThe ryzen unit will almost defenitely be better (you can also check out some benchmarks)I would recommend the Ryzen 5 3500U over the 8th Gen i5.
Overall AMD is the clear winner. One isHere are some other options: Asus zenbook 14 (4500u version) Lenovo Flex 14 Acer Swift 3 Acer nitro 5 (this one AN515-43-R34S) Hp envy x360Currently I am using the Vivobook X509DJ - 8GB RAM, RYZEN 5 3500U, 2GB RADEON VEGA 8 and 2GB MX 230. Most Read. A decent performance boost that gets the 10600K in range of the 10700K and 10900K -- not quite the same level, but certainly comparable performance.Those margins change slightly at 1440p, here the 10600K was 8% faster than the 3700X and 3600, while it was only 6% behind the 10700K and 10900K.Anyway, in terms of performance the 10600K is very similar to the 8700K and that means that while it's able to match the average frame rate of the 9900K, 10700K and 10900K, it was about 8% slower when looking at the 1% low data.Performance at 1440p is again strong, though as expected the margins do close up but even so the 10600K is still 8% faster than the 3700X.Moving on to the gaming benchmarks we have Battlefield V up first with the 1080p results using a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti graphics card. vs. Intel Core i5-8305G. vs. AMD Ryzen 5 2500U. Quick Specs. As far as we're aware no retailer has received stock and we’ve been told there will be no stock available in Q2. For the 3500U, while gaming you might reach a tempature of around 80 C; where as that temperature is just 60 C in 4500U. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements.
A word about the cache size – 2MB more cache for i5-10210U – 6MB vs 4MB. vs. Intel Core i3-10110U.