AMD Epyc 7302 vs AMD Epyc 7302P: 7. AMD EPYC 7302P was released in Q4 2019 and supports SP3 socket. From a system resource perspective, we configured each VM with 16 vCPUs, 60GB of DRAM and leveraged the LSI Logic SAS SCSI controller.Our Percona MySQL OLTP database measured via SysBench. This testing wasn’t to show which is better, that is typically the one with the highest core count. How do you feel overall after tr2950x?Mem write: Epyc Octal DDR4-2933R 23-21-21-47 CR1 85295 MB/sProbably not, it's fast enough for my purposeI have some questions for you, trying to build a Rome system for my company.you try to OC RAM or tweak lower timmings?H11 v2 boards are only available from authorized resellers that have a Combo Kit from Supermicro's Factory. GPU and CPU Benchmarks for Monero Mining. 8 octets 16 nibbles . Forged from the finest silicon. AMD Epyc 7302 - Cinebench 11.5, Cinebench R15, PassMark und Geekbench 3 CPU Benchmark-Ergebnisse AMD EPYC 7302 / 7402 / 7502 / 7742 Linux Performance Benchmarks Review: Posted on Tuesday, September 17 2019 @ 17:48:41 CEST by Thomas De Maesschalck "Last month we provided launch-day benchmarks of the AMD EPYC 7502 and 7742 under Linux in both 1P and 2P configurations for these exciting "Rome" Zen 2 server processors. Updated: June 2020. I'll report backI was waiiti3for that comment TR2950x with PBO on 360 water: 5:07mLatency: Epyc Octal DDR4-2933R 23-21-21-47 CR1 121.1 nsThe Epyc is in a 19" chassis for work and will run 2 VMs, maybe 3, 2 Databases and a file storage raid with 28GB RAID on sata enterprise SSDs.

The 7302P had an aggregate score of 1,712ms with individual VMs ranging from 872ms to 2,736ms.The AMD EPYC 7002 came out with the promise of more performance with fewer sockets. And no I don't have Linux installed.I have a question, what do you see for clock speeds during your loads? I am looking for single threaded vs all core.What do you use it for, if you don't mind me asking?=) Do you have linux on this machine in addition to Windows? Clockspeed: 3.0 GHz. AMD Epyc 7302P vs Intel Xeon Gold 5118: 6. In all of our charts we include the aggregate compute speed of each CPU.Sysbench Testing Configuration (per VM)In our worst-case scenario (99th percentile) latency we saw scores of 31.1ms for the 7702P, 159.6ms for the 7402P, and 231.2ms for the 7302P.For SQL Server average latency the 7702P had an aggregate score of 5ms with individual VMs ranging from 4ms to 6ms. AMD Epyc 7302P vs Intel Core i7-7500U: 13. In these cases AMD has the opportunity to provide even more value to solutions providers, besides being a lower cost part.StorageReview’s Microsoft SQL Server OLTP testing protocol employs the current draft of the Transaction Processing Performance Council’s Benchmark C (TPC-C), an online transaction processing benchmark that simulates the activities found in complex application environments. Technology: CMOS Clock: 2,000 MHz-2,400 MHz Package: FCLGA-4094 Socket: Socket … Each SQL Server VM is configured with two vDisks: 100GB volume for boot and a 500GB volume for the database and log files. Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core . From a system resource perspective, we configured each VM with 16 vCPUs, 64GB of DRAM and leveraged the LSI Logic SAS SCSI controller.

We used 4VMs and 4 NVMe drives for SQL Server and 8VMs and 8 NVMe drives for Sysbench. The 7402P had an aggregate score of 5.25ms with VMs ranging from 3ms to 6ms.

Our emphasis is on storage solutions for the midmarket and enterprise, with limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions.As one can see form the results above, the AMD EPYC CPU family continues to impress. AMD Epyc 7302 - Cinebench 11.5, Cinebench R15, PassMark and Geekbench 3 CPU Benchmark results AMD EPYC 7302P - CPU benchmark, performance score . Will probably be in about a months time as the lead times on the machines from Dell is several weeks at this point. The 64 core 7702P was, unsurprisingly the top performer with SQL aggregate scores of 12,634 TPS and an average latency of 5ms and Sysbench saw the CPU with an aggregate of 15,914 TPS, an average latency of 16ms, and a 99th percentile latency of 31.1ms. The 16 core 7302P had SQL scores of 9,397.6 TPS, with an average latency of 1,712ms; for Sysbench the CPU saw 2,261.3 TPS, an average latency of 113.3ms, and a 99th percentile latency of 231.2ms.For Sysbench we tested 8VMs and saw aggregate scores of 15,914 TPS for the 7702P, 3,369.3 TPS for the 7402P, and 2,261.3 TPS for the 7302P.This test uses SQL Server 2014 running on Windows Server 2012 R2 guest VMs, and is stressed by Quest Software’s Benchmark Factory for Databases.