Not only will you save a couple of hundred dollars; but you will also get better performance in most gameplay situations. Let’s be real: if you’re not making money off your work, waiting a few extra minutes for a render might not be a big concern. The 9900K offers a base clock of 3.6 GHz, can boost to 5 GHz on up to two cores, and up to 4.7 GHz on all eight cores. Its 16 cores and 32 threads redefine what's possible for the mainstream, and its comparatively affordable price-per-core is a great value.”Speaking of memory, Zen 2 processors officially support dual-channel DDR4-3200, and the Ryzen 9 3950X is no exception.AMD’s Ryzen has always been an amazing foundation for productivity machines, but they’ve never been as competitive in gaming performance as they are now. But the 2950X has a higher overall score due to its strength in Excel, where its extra cores and large caches help close the gap, and the Edge browser test.Don’t get us wrong; the Ryzen 9 3950X can hold its own just fine in gaming workloads. But in games like Far Cry 5 and Grand Theft Auto 5, the Ryzen 9 3950X runs head to head with processors that command a much lower price tag.That said, most casual enthusiasts will be better served looking downstream to AMD's Ryzen 9 3900X for mainstream performance, while the Ryzen 9 3950X really is on a level of its own. In our tests, we had trouble maintaining a 4.3 GHz overclock on all cores. When you look at the Ryzen 9 3950X through the prism of someone who wanted but couldn’t afford a Threadripper, the Ryzen 9 starts to look like a very attractive option.However, if what you’re after is the absolute highest frame rate in the games you play, there’s no other option than to go with Intel. Only boards with robust power delivery systems are suited for the task, and you wouldn’t want to run this CPU on a motherboard with cheap power circuitry anyway.In Blender, the story continues: The Ryzen 9 3950X ran the quick benchmark in 505 seconds, while the i9 took its sweet time and finished the test in 916 seconds.If you’re in the market for a workstation PC for general productivity and Microsoft Office related tasks, you should probably be looking for a more mid-tier CPU to save some money. Even though the Core i9-9900K's primary advantage is its clock speeds, the chip doesn’t put off nearly as much heat as AMD’s counterpart. Heavy workstation users should consider the Ryzen 9 3900X which is similarly priced. The i9 processors also include 16MB of L3 cache memory.Intel is still the king for gamers looking for the highest gaming performance possible, and AMD continues to leverage the benefits of its core-heavy architecture. Currently I stream to Twitch and edit my streams for YouTube making small clips etc. AMD’s Zen 2 architecture offers significant improvements in per-core performance over previous generations, but the changes still can't completely counter Intel’s advantage.In the Cinebench R20 tests, our Ryzen 9 3950X was bested only by AMD’s 32-core Threadripper 2990WX and an overclocked 18-core Core i9-9980XE in the multi-threaded test. To keep the temperatures in check with an extra four cores under the lid, AMD reduced the base core clock of the 3950X to 3.5 GHz. As we wrote in our review of the processor; “to say this chip blurs the lines between the mainstream desktop and HEDT is an understatement: In reality, it brings HEDT-class performance to the friendlier pricing of mainstream motherboards, placing it in a class of its own.“The 9900K is rated at a 95W TDP and also includes solder TIM (sTIM), to facilitate heat dissipation.Like the rest of Intel’s 9000-series processors, the Core i9-9900K features support for dual-channel DDR4-2666 memory. If you plan to use CPU streaming which is more intensive but also provides a little better quality, the 3950x will be better.Which of the two are the best for my situation?For video editing it will depend on the software you use. It’s built on the Zen 2 microarchitecture, which uses the Infinity Fabric interconnect to combine multiple chiplets to form high core-count CPUs.