3600 vs i5-9600KF specifications comparison The graphs below compare the most important characteristics of the Intel i5-9600KF and 3600 CPUs. We have to admit at times we felt we were feeding the 9400F to a woodchipper. 一、r5-3600和r5-3600x參數對比. It consumed 22% less power than the R5 3600 in the Blender benchmark though you must take in consideration that it was also 35% slower, so performance per watt still favors the Ryzen processor.Moving on to gaming testing, first up we have Assassin's Creed: Odyssey. Hi, I found this searching - You mentioned the price as a reason to get the 3600. Both have been tested using their included box cooler -- yes, Intel’s lousy box cooler works just fine with the 9400F and it’s not even loud, as the locked part is very power efficient.We're using 16GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 memory for both CPUs, meaning the 9400F was tested on a The graphics card of choice was the powerful However, perhaps a more ominous sign for the Intel 6-core processor is the single core test, here the R5 3600 was still 14% faster, so it’s rare that you’ll find a productivity workload where the 9400F can match the 3600, let alone beat it.Adobe Premiere shows the Core i5's best showing yet as the R5 3600 was 26% faster. … [요청] i5-9600KF 램 2666 CL13 vs 라이젠 3600 램... 11. Here the R5 3600 boosted frame rates by almost 30% over the 9400F and I expect we’ll see more results like this in core heavy games.The Ryzen processor was just 6% faster in Battlefield V when looking at the average frame rate, but 34% faster when measuring 1% low performance, The R5 3600 did provide a noticeably smoother gaming experience in this title.The gaming experience when testing with Shadow of the Tomb Raider was similar with both CPUs, though the average frame rate was 4% higher with the R5 3600, while the 1% low performance was improved by 10%.We also see a solid performance uplift in The Division 2, the R5 3600 provided an 18% performance uplift for the average frame rate and a 29% boost for the 1% low.As is often the case, Far Cry New Dawn does trip up the Ryzen processors and here the 9400F managed to take the lead, beating the R5 3600 by up to 19%, so a very convincing win for the Core i5 processor.Frame rates in Rage 2 were quite close with an edge to the Ryzen processor in the 1% low result, but overall both felt very similar in actual gameplay.We see something similar thing in Hitman 2, average frame rates were a match but the R5 3600 was slightly stronger when it came to the 1% low performance.And finally we have Total War: Three Kingdoms and as was the case with Rage 2 and Hitman 2, we find close average frame rate results, but an advantage to AMD when looking at 1% low performance. In this case the difference was more substantial with Ryzen offering 12% better minimum frame rates.That was interesting and even a bit brutal. For the past two months it's been offered at the To answer that we’ll compare both CPUs in a range of games and applications. Intel Core i5-9600KF vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600.
This makes recommending Intel’s 8th and 9th generation LGA1151 platform difficult in 2019. The margin is smaller but you should also take into consideration CPU heavy titles where the 9400F was stuttering a bit (Battlefield V and Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, for example).
I'll primarily be using it for gaming - in fact, almost exclusively.